Pamphlet 30 July 2009, YFE JNU

There is a saying in Hindi ‘Chor Ke Dadi Main Tinka’. Probably this may suit nobody better than the Shameful AISA. We don’t know about which lab of SLS they meant refereeing to the YFE pamphlet, but there must be something fishy, which one or more member/s of the said lab knows and of which the AISA is paranoid! Friends let us talk fact:

• AISA said twice UGBM extended their term, even then also their term was over in May 2009! Aren’t they ashamed of calling them as JNUSU?

Strange is AISA’s believe on JNU Tradition! Are we going to extend the JNUSU through UGBM for another 40 years to preserve the JNU tradition of last 40 years! When the terms of the JNUSU end? Only AISA knows as they only are well versed in JNU tradition! Another set of facts:

• If the JNUSU does not require any stamp from the VC, why have not they gone to election in 2008? What happened to the immunity of JNUSU from the office of Vice Chancellor?
• Why it is that the stamping of the Vice Chancellor is accepted all the 40 years of JNU tradition with the Election Commissioner getting certificate from the JNU Vice Chancellor?
• If the VC does not mean anything to the JNUSU, why the same VC denied them a seat in any of their official meeting in the post November 2008 scenario? Why they denied copy of any official proceeding? If the JNUSU can’t seat in the any of the meeting of JNU administration, what is its use and who care its existence? What happen to the student mandate in the UGBM?
• If the UGBM is so valid & so strong why JNUSU is not allowed a space in JNU administration?
• AISA is shameless – all YFE counselors have resigned from their post and the submission is made to the Supreme Court of India on 2 January 2009 and the wording of the submission said: “We believe in the law of the land and we honor the Supreme Court order. When we realized the fact that the 2007 JNUSU was illegal, all the student representatives of Youth For Equality elected during the 2007 student union elections resigned without any delay. (Resignation letter is attached)”.
• It is not the YFE but the same above certification authority namely Vice Chancellor who said that JNUSU is illegal replying to an RTI and it is only YFE which is daring to tell the truth!

AISA is only degrading the student mandate in the UGBM. They cannot restore the prestige of the students they have lost for their greed to remained glued to the chair.

YFE never started the student assistance process during admission, neither it is desperate to do it! YFE never paranoid newcomers with threat, neither YFE accommodate the freshers in exchange of vote! Rather YFE advocates one widow admission system done by the administration! Is not it possible to assistant the student without a political tag if there is a need to assist? It is well established that who stones YFE member Sumeet Kishore to grab a newcomer in 2007! A known AISA criminal Rajan Pandey’s near fatal attack to Sumeet Kishore in 2007 and his subsequent rustication from JNU is a proof how AISA run admission assistance!

If there is a competition on shamelessness and betrayal nobody beats AISA! The AISA knows better than anyone else who started the meritocracy movement way back in 1990? If the memory of AISA does not falter they must recall the fact that it was AISA with NO MANDAL NO COMMANDAL slogan! What happened to them now? One thing is clear – when you spit towards the sun, it will drop on your face only! But opium protect you from shamelessness!

AISA people are imbecile. It was known to all, even the illiterates, that Adl. Solicitor General Gopal Subramaniam complains to the Supreme Court about the non-implementation of the Lyngdoh in JNU and YFE had no role in it! AISA lawyer told to the Supreme Court that all JNU community disagree with Lyngdoh recommendation and it was at this time YFE lawyer stood up and said YFE is agreeing with Lyngdoh! Who authorized the AISA lawyer to speak on behalf of YFE?

Betrayal??? The students memorized history! They all aware of the communist betrayal during the Quit India Movement and during China War! Who are habitual betrayers? Even the communists spell their own name without hesitation!

BHAGAT SINGH, ASFAQ, AZAD, DUSHYANT, JAIPRAKASH NARAYAN - WERE ALL THEY FIGHTING FOR PROFIT, FOR POWER, FOR POSITION, FOR OFFICE AND FOR EXTENDING THEIR TENURE INFINITELY????

It is disgusting that few power hungry communists equating themselves with Bhagat Singh, Azad, Asfaq who embraced death but never accepted any compromise or position, with Dushyant who embraced humiliation but refused any literary awards or material comforts, with JP who prefer jail to any ministerial birth!

AISA talks a lot about YFE money! But where does its own funding comes for the year long pamphlets, for huge hoardings, for funding election and for opium??? AISA arrested the helpless Registrar for eight hours – was it not a rude display of muscle power? AISA attacked Sumeet Kishor and send him to cranial injury – was not that a bizarre display of muscle power? Much has been talked about UGBM. YFE believes that to extend an electoral mandate the appeal of the UGBM is limited. Unlike the election, majority of students never participate in UGBM and hence it has no authority to extend electoral mandate! What about UGBM? What is the voting procedure of UGBM?

• Is it open? Is it secret? Is it through secret ballot paper? Is it through EVM? At what time the UGBM voting takes place? And what is the percentage of participation of JNU student, in the name of whom they are ruling, at the voting?
• AISA people must be under the influence of OPIUM! Always!

Lyngdoh never restrict JNU tradition, debate, discussion or anything! It only restricts the inroads of nasty political parties into the campus! Lyngdoh is an obituary message to the stooges of political parties. Student knows that better!

Pamphlet 28 July 2009, YFE JNU

As the admission of new entrants is going on, voices of politically backed student organizations of JNU campus is getting shriller. Claims and counterclaims are selling like hot cake. Few students trying their best to portray themselves as the JNUSU of this campus! The illegal claim of JNUSU has even been punctured by the JNU administration by denying them a seat in any official meeting and also denying them the copy of any official meeting. But not ashamed of this kind of treatment by the JNU administration, the illegal self proclaimed office bearer JNUSU ballooning their claim as JNUSU with pamphlets and with sticker in their chest and running from newcomer to newcomer trying to convince them that they are the ILLEGAL JNUSU of this campus. Even before a newcomer enter to this campus he or she may taste the bitter test of nasty politics inside the campus.

The latest stunt of the illegal JNUSU was trying to score point by targeting the security apparatus of the university. Even a newborn baby knows the fact that the JNU security is not here to harass any student or student body but only to follow the instruction of the university. If they are so confident of their official post why they are not storming the official meetings of JNU, from where they have been discarded unceremoniously? But the reaction as well as reflection of other student bodies inside the campus on the issue of the status of the illegal JNUSU is like that of ‘don’t ask don’t say’. But this stand is for public consumption and privately all of them must be cursing themselves for supporting privately an illegal JNUSU! When Lyngdoh was being debated inside the campus whether to be implemented or not everybody boasting the long standing tradition of JNU election!

• Now what happened to that long standing tradition?
• Is that long standing tradition of JNU election is still protected?
• Is it true that all the students of JNU are happy with the illegal and forced occupation of JNUSU by AISA?
• Who give them the mandate to push the JNUSU election into an uncertain future?
• Neither the Supreme Court of India nor the Government of India is desperate to conduct the JNUSU election! Also the JNU administration is very happy with the absence of a JNUSU! Who is ultimately suffering for not abiding by the Lyngdoh Committee Recommendations?
• It is only YFE which is proudly supporting Lyngdoh Committee Recommendation and it was YFE lawyer, who saved JNU from an indefinite stay on election. Who is responsible for not conducting election and making the Supreme Court stay a permanent order?

But few questions are very interesting as everybody know its answer but nobody like to answer it in public! It is like the old traditional Hindu wife, who knows her husband’s name better than anybody else but never names him in public for reason unknown to even her!

• What is the stand of SFI, ABVP and NSUI on the legality of JNUSU?
• SFI, ABVP and NSUI want JNUSU election but when and how?
• Why SFI, ABVP and NSUI want JNUSU election if they don’t have any opposition to the present illegal JNUSU?
• Doesn’t the JNU student understand hypocrisy and the fact that SFI, ABVP and NSUI have accepted Lyngdoh Committee Recommendation in Delhi University and in all over India but in JNU?
• When is the next hearing on JNUSU election at the Supreme Court? AISA is rumoring the fact that they are told by their lawyer that the next hearing is on 16^th of August 2009! This is a white lie as this date is a Sunday!

Nothing much can be done in this regard! YFE lawyer has already approached the Supreme Court and requested that YFE is ready to contest the election with Lyngdoh Recommendation and election in JNU be allowed to which the Supreme Court have no objection. But the JNU administration, which is the nodal body to conduct the elections, is facing contempt of court for not adopting Lyngdoh in the year 2006 and 2007 JNUSU election and hence is paralyzed to conduct any election! It is a catch 22 situation and only adhering to Lyngdoh can save JNU’s long tradition of student union election!

Pamphlet 24 July 2009, YFE JNU

No matter what ever coming into their way – shamelessness, defame, dishonour and even eviction from the premise of JNU, the illegal JNUSU never stopped claiming that they are the elected student body. The administration way back in 2008 admitted that the University never certifies the JNUSU elected in the year 2007. We are now in 2009 and still they are claiming that they are the elected student leaders and hold the office of JNUSU! There shamelessness has now crossed all limits as they are categorically told by the administration that JNU do not recognize the presence of JNUSU and they cannot open a counter for admission assistance!

The three frauds who claims themselves that they are the office bearer of JNUSU teaching the JNU student JNU culture! What is JNU Culture?

• Occupying the JNUSU illegally and not respecting the student aspiration is JNU culture?
• For how long the JNUSU function? Forcefully in true communist style capturing the office of JNUSU that is what the JNU culture?
• Catching newcomers at the gate itself forcefully and instilling them fear and paranoia during the admission is what called JNU culture?
• Why they wanted to teach JNU culture to the security officer, who was only following the order of the JNU administration? Isn’t the Vice-Chancellor, who head the JNU administration, does not know what JNU culture is?
• For how long they will hold the JNUSU post and teach JNU culture to the students including the newcomers?
• Occupying the JNUSU office for an indefinite period, is this what JNU culture?

Youth For Equality wanted to know, if there is any financial aid to the illegal JNUSU? We warn the administration not to hobnob with the illegal JNUSU, which is claiming legality day in and day out otherwise we have to seek the intervention of the Supreme Court to tell them that the administration must face the music for sheltering the illegal JNUSU.

We believe that the JNU administration is providing the illegal JNUSU the platform to function. This is unacceptable to the student community of this campus. It is the blunder of the JNU administration and the Communist student body, which never allowed the election inside the campus for the first time in its history! It is also clear that without following Lyngdoh Commission Recommendation, election into the JNUSU is not possible. No one is getting affected by the delay in JNUSU election but the students of this university.

The claim of the illegal JNUSU is strange! They are writing pamphlets that it was due to their efforts only that the admissions of the new students are possible! What a joke! Is it possible on the part of the administration to refuse a student who has got admission if there is no assistance from the illegal JNUSU? And what is the role of JNUSU, even if illegal? Instead of making the policy more transparent and easier, these stupid students are making the admission time as one occasion to recruit new students to their party fold! Why can’t there be single window system? Why assistance is required from professional political student bodies to take admission in JNU?

Now one after another student bodies including ABVP and SFI wanted JNUSU election! But the question arises here is – who stopped the student election? ABVP now succumbed to the Lyngdoh Pressure and ready to follow the recommendation of Lyngdoh Committee for student union election! SFI is suffocating under the breathlessness of allowing its friendly rival AISA to illegally occupy JNUSU office for an indefinite period! They forgot the contribution of Youth For Equality at the Supreme Court when the lawyer of YFE restrained the Supreme Court from ordering a blanket stay on the election. It was due to the YFE the stay was conditional and the condition was ‘if the university follows Lyngdoh Recommendation’ the Supreme Court has no objection for the JNUSU election.

The stupidity of these student bodies that are refusing to follow Lyngdoh recommendation for their personal benefit, is actually the biggest hindrance for JNUSU election. The presence of illegal JNUSU inside the campus is unacceptable to the JNU students and the administration must end the illegality.

Pamphlet 16 July 2009, YFE JNU

JNU students know when the last JNU Student Union Election was held. They also know that presently there is no JNUSU functioning. The JNU students very much aware of the fact that the 2007 student union election without, which never followed the Lyngdoh Recommendation was illegal and this was admitted by the JNU administration without any doubt. But still few people are claiming themselves as the reigning JNUSU as if ‘maan na maan main tera Shahrukh Khan’.

Friends, the communists are now confused what to do in the campus and spreading rumor regarding the implementation of OBC reservation. In the landmark judgment of “Youth for Equality vs. Union of India” delivered on 10 April 2008 the Supreme Court ordered that “The Government need not always provide the maximum limit. Reasonable cut off marks should be set so that standards of excellence greatly effect. The unfilled seats should revert to the general category.” Justice Pasayat and Thackker in the same judgment said “If any seats remain vacant after adopting such norms they shall be filled up by candidates from general categories.”

The Central Government did not follow the order in 2008 admission session and again Youth For Equality reached to the Supreme Court. Judgment pronounced by Justices K.G. Balakrishnan, Arijit Pasayat, C.K. Thakkar, R.V. Ravendran and Dalveer Bhandari of the Supreme Court of India on the plea of Youth For Equality on 15^th September 08 was as follows:

1) “What is the confusion? It was clarified in the judgment itself that the seats remaining vacant after the implementation of 27% OBC quota in Central Educational Institutions, including IITs and IIMs will go to the General Category. The wasting of seats cannot be allowed. It will go back to the general category. The reservation was not for ensuring that even if they (OBC) are not there, it will not go to others. It is very clear. The intention was that don’t leave the seat vacant. The intention was to give better education.”

2) "If the cut-off for general category is 50% marks in the entrance examination, you cannot admit OBC candidates who have secured just 25% marks. You cannot dilute merit altogether. That is why three of the five judges on the constitution bench had favoured a cut-off for OBC candidates — either 5% (two judges) or 10% (one judge) less than that of general candidates."

3) “The Centre, which appeared to be in a hurry to fill all the OBC seats, could not dilute merit by reducing the cut-off marks for backward class students much lower than that prescribed for the general category.”

4) “The concept of carrying forward to the next academic year the quota seats which remained unfilled is not allowed. If any seats remain vacant after adopting such norms, they shall be filled up by candidates from general categories."

Over 6,000 OBC seats in undergraduate courses in Delhi University will go to general category students this year due to absence of candidates in the reserved category. The Delhi University has 10,183 seats for OBC students. However, the varsity unable to fill these seats due to less number of applications from the OBC students. The DU administration said that “Several seats of our various colleges are still vacant. These seats will be converted into general category seats after 14 August as per the university’s earlier decision. At least two third of the total OBC seats are expected to be converted into the general seats, thus providing greater opportunity for candidates other than OBC categories”.

The JNU cannot have a different policy of its own and vacant OBC seats must go to the General Category students otherwise it may attract contempt of the Supreme Court.